However since we got through we have been simply the greatest team in the tournament. We played great cricket, and today's win against Australia has been as good as any one of our performances. We won by 7 wickets, (with 18 balls remaining) and played some phenomenal cricket.
We pinned Australia back brilliantly, and Watson, Warner and Haddin didn't last long thanks to a mixture of brilliant bowling and fielding, something which is more valuable than most people imagine in the Twenty over format.
Australia made 147-6 on a pitch where 170+ was more competitive, and true to form we came out and knocked it off with relative ease. Sadly Michael Lumb made just 7 runs, but his South African countryman Craig Kieswetter made his biggest score of the competition in 63, earning him the man of the match award. KP made 47 and Paul Collingwood and Eoin Morgan were there to take us home.
We have been terrific in all areas throughout the tournament in batting, bowling and fielding. We have looked commanding, professional and focussed and we have really found a brilliant lineup for this format of the game.
I don't know if it has been just because England have been playing well, but I don't believe that the grumblers grumbling about the World Twenty20 being timed wrongly after the IPL and the lack of crowd at the tournament are at all correct.
The relaxed rules from the disastrous 2007 World Cup held in the West Indies have meant for a nicer, more relaxed atmosphere, but the ever reliable crowd were there to crank up the volume when it was needed. I couldn't care less that it was timed after the IPL, and I found it rather refreshing from the glossy sponsor-plastered coverage of the previous tournament.
The quality of cricket has been better than that of the IPL and overall it can be considered a terrific tournament, and, after 35 years of waiting, England are world champions!








